A Space for Children in the Home
July 6, 2016
4

“If children do not have space to release a tremendous amount of energy when they need to, they will drive themselves and everybody else in the family up the wall.” Christopher Alexander, A Pattern Language

We need spaces that foster the various aspects of human life. This applies especially to children.

Some spaces–such as the family room or the kitchen–allow us to enact our unity as a family: our lives are so intertwined that we cannot be whole without one another. Here our children experience that they belong somewhere, because here they live one life with us.

But at the same time we each have our own lives. And the spaces of our home should reflect this too.

Our children need a space that empowers them, indeed invites them to use some of their prodigious energy and creativity in relative isolation from adults. Precisely because such activities do not have a place in the other spaces of our home, it is incumbent upon us to prepare a special space for them.

If at some times—and there are a few—children should be seen and not heard, then likewise there are times, and thus places, where their boisterous activity should proceed unencumbered, with no detriment to the activities or peace of others. This is a delicate balance. Given that we rightly expect at times our children to conform themselves to the standards and sensibilities of adult activities, we actually bolster this effort by also allowing the wholesome release of energy in a space fitted for their physical and psychic inclinations.

A world where fewer and fewer spaces are truly safe and friendly for children calls us to be more intentional in preparing the spaces of our home, guided by an understanding of children’s true needs.

Alexander’s further thoughts:

“Start by placing the small area which will belong entirely to children—the cluster of their beds. Place it in a separate position toward the back of the house, and in such a way that a continuous playspace can be made from this cluster to the street, almost like a wide swath inside the house, muddy, toys strewn along the way, touching those family room which children need—the bathroom and the kitchen most of all—passing the common area along one side (but leaving quiet sitting areas and the couple’s realm entirely separate and inviolate), reaching out to the street, either through its own door or through the entrance room, and ending in an outdoor room, connected to the street, and sheltered, and large enough so that the children can play in it when it rains, yet still be indoors.” Pp. 654-55

Cuddeback comment: This prescription from Alexander is perhaps impractical in a number of its details given the already existing structure of our house. What strikes me is the principle, which we might still apply in arranging or disposing already existing spaces. Children should be made comfortable in pursuing active play in congenial indoor space, always with an eye to being connected to the great outdoors. Among other things, such spaces can be conducive to active engagement with people and the world, as opposed to passive entertainment.

This is the fourth of a series taking a thoughtful tour through a house, room by room, based on the writings of Christopher Alexander.

Christopher Alexander (born 1936) was born in Austria and is currently an emeritus professor of architecture at the University of California, where he taught for almost forty years. He has been widely influential through his theories of architecture, and is especially known for his 1977 book A Pattern Language.

Image: Ludwig Knaus (1829-1910), Ein Kinderfest

Leave a Reply

4 comments

  1. Lots here to dig into! I noticed you drew a distinction between engagement (recreation) and passive entertainment. I recall John Senior having made that same distinction in The restoration of Christian Culture. Is that something you’ve read, John?
    – Joshua Horne (Monica Graves introduced as at Three Foxes vineyard at the end of last summer)

    1. Thanks Joshua. I have read that great book. John Senior had great insight into the challenges we face and how to address them. Best wishes.

  2. Thank you for these posts on Christopher Alexander. I also wanted to thank you for your music suggestions in the two week challenge post a while back.

    I married into a family with in-laws who have lots of kids. My own family is growing as well. Although we all enjoy having so many children present at family gatherings, it does become hectic when the kids don’t have enough space to move around. As a result, we’re constantly trying to come up with venues that will accommodate our ever growing families and provide for active play for our children. The quote by Alexander rings very true for us.

    Have you read Alexander’s Nature of Order series? If so, do you view any of his patterns being rooted in Eastern philosophies that do not accurately perceive reality? As a convert from Eastern Orthodoxy, I generally enjoy the Eastern approach; however, I wonder about how Alexander’s world view influences his practical suggestions.

    1. Patrick, Thanks for the comment. You raise a great question. I have not yet read his Nature of Order series, though I hope to start soon. From what I have read thus far in Alexander what strikes me is this: he seems to have a profound appreciation for objective patterns that are part of the very fabric of reality. He likewise has seen the connection between objective aspects of human goodness and patterns of activities and physical spaces. He does not use a traditional vocabulary to express his insights, yet I have been consistently impressed with the depth of his perception. I will say that there are a couple of areas where I was disappointed in his position. But overall I have found him to be an excellent guide in thinking about many practical aspects of human life. Thanks again.